Why Support Ron Paul

66

By MikeNV

2012 Your Chance to Fix the Country or Watch it Implode

A lot of people say Ron Paul can’t win but when confronted with “Why”, they have no answer. Why can’t Ron Paul win? Paul wants to stop Wars, Dismantle the Federal Reserve, Follow the Constitution, and reduce the size of Government. These goals will directly benefit the working class and give people a chance to take care of their families. People complain all the time about how Congress makes so much money, has a Cadillac Health Plan, etc. But when given the choice to vote for a Candidate who will actually do something about it… they forget their anger and cast their vote for the status quo. That makes no sense at all, but that is the mindset of people who get their news from the Banker Owned Media.

Have you ever watched your local news and heard them report on a story in which you know a lot about? Are the facts ever straight? Do you ever scratch your head and say to yourself… geez these people know nothing about (Whatever topic you know a lot about). Well that is the “news”. The people reading the Teleprompters don’t know anything about what they are talking about. They are feed a script and they just read it. They are told what to read. The content comes from their “Reporters” which usually means a syndicate of distributed content. It has to be “approved” by ownership, etc. The News you see on Television isn’t really news… it’s scripted story telling.

The mainstream media which is owned by the Bankers (Yes there really are only a handful of Media companies who own all the brands of media) tells you what to think and what to believe. Just like in the movies, they paint whatever picture they want you to see. They report only what is in their own interests according to their agenda. You are nothing but a pawn. Twist, skew, spin… keep the power and control in the hands of the select few. These companies report to the Banking Elite who own their stocks. And Ron Paul wants to disband the very organization which makes them wealthy for doing absolutely nothing.

Gee I wonder why Ron Paul can’t get any press coverage.

Most people do not have the time, education, or interest to track financial matters on a Macro scale, so they trust the Government will do the right thing, after all isn't the Government elected for the benefit of the people?

One would think so. Sadly it's not.

There are over $80 Trillion dollars in BONDS floating around the Globe.

The Federal Reserve announced this week that they will borrow $305 Billion in Quarter 4 2011, and another %541 Billion in Quarter 1, 2012. That's $846 Billion in 6 months! Gee I wonder why they wanted to raise the Credit Limit? The $2 Trillion Credit Limit raise will be gone in this rate in 1.5 years.

Now here is where it gets more interesting.

According to the IRS Wages Reported on 81 million tax returns $7.6 Trilion. Federal Government Spending so far this year with 2 months to go $3.6 Trillion.

3.6/7.6 = 47%

So if taxes were raised on EVERYONE... rich and poor, from the kid working part time at McDonalds to the CEO's of the Fortune 500 that would cover what has been spent so far this year… but this year is not over yet!

Can Americans afford a Flat 47% Federal Income Tax? Keeping in mind this does NOT include State or Local Taxes.

You already know the answer.

For perspective in 1980 the NATIONAL DEBT was $1 Trillion, now they are spending that much in less than a year.

The Debt is too large to be repaid. Servicing the Interest on the debt alone is almost beyond reach.

But the biggest question of all is this: "Who do we owe all the money to?"

The answer is the Federal Reserve... the people who print money from nothing, then sell it to the Citizens at Interest.

All money is loaned into existence (Excepting coin which is just minted and distributed).

When money is created under the Fractional Reserve Banking and loaned into existance the Interest on the money is not created. Thus there is never enough money to pay the interest, so more money must be created.

What do we gain when we pay $25 for a loaf of bread? This is after all "Growth" under the current system. We gain nothing.

When we lose our jobs and can not pay, whatever we "own" goes to the banks.

Some system eh? Can you name the ONLY Candidate who wants to abolish the Federal Reserve? Hint: It's not Obama, Romney, Cain, or Perry.

Until the Federal Reserve is gone and the ownership of the money supply is returned to the people there can be no recovery. The math is actually very simple, the spin you see on TV is just a ploy to sedate the masses while the remainder of their assets are confiscated and put in control of the Banking Elite. So go ahead and vote for the guy who supports your Union, your idea about abortion, your government handout, your… whatever. None of it matters if you do not have the income to support yourself.

Ron Paul can only win if people wake up. Sadly I don’t see that happening. But I’ll still be voting for him for as long as possible. One can only hope the Ignorant and Stupid among us will see what really matters, is independence, the constitution, and real opportunity to make something of you. And Debt is Slavery. You either vote to be a slave or you don’t. It’s your choice.

Comments

CWanamaker profile image

CWanamaker Level 5 Commenter 6 months ago

I support Ron Paul as well. He may be a bit 'out there' but I believe he is the one that we need to make a real change. Ron Paul isn't afraid to speak the truth or stick to his guns. The media really needs to give him more coverage...but they won't.

MikeNV profile image

MikeNV Hub Author 6 months ago

He's not "out there" at all. Everything he says makes perfect sense. And until someone deals with the Banks the Poor and Middle Class can look forward to an even lower standard of living.

What is "out there" is 3 years in a row of Deficit Spending exceeding $1.3 Trillion.

Recovery is NOT possible under the current Debt Slavery System Administered by the Banking Cartel. There is no possible way to recover from the mountain of debt that is owed to the Bankers.

Once Greece falls the Banks will begin to crumble. The sooner the better. Those who believe in perpetual debt will likely lose everything, those who prepare will not.

arizonataylor profile image

arizonataylor Level 1 Commenter 6 months ago

YES! A recent Nobel Prize winner in economics stated that the national debt isn't a big deal, because the government largely owes the money to American citizens. I agree with you, debt it debt. Our crushing debt devalues the dollar and causes inflation. Our crushing debt results in interest that we can't afford to pay. Ron Paul isn't my primary choice, but I certainly agree with a lot of what he says. If he's the conservative choice, he'll have my vote. Somebody has to do SOMETHING about the debt.

Who were the last two presidents to have a balanced budget? Clinton and Nixon. When was the last time we were debt free? Under Jackson. It's been awhile.

Great hub.

MikeNV profile image

MikeNV Hub Author 6 months ago

The Debt is owed to shareholders of the Federal Reserve, or whomever purchases the Treasury Bonds.... Typically held by the Private Bankers who run the Federal Reserve. The actual people are Private and due to Corporate Privacy laws there is no real way of knowing who actually holds the stock. It should be appalling to the masses that anyone who holds Federal Reserve Stock (Which is NOT publicly avaialable) is guarnteed a return of 6% per year.

Who holds the stock? It can be anyone in any country, who is "In" the Private Banking Elite. In fact our "Terrorist" enemies could actually be shareholders.

To put the American Populace on the hook for these Bankers is not only irresponsible it's devestating. Look around an you can witness the suffering.

Clinton had a Balanced Budget on paper by utilizing a trick of shifting money from one place to the other. Clinton still ran up the National Debt EVERY SINGLE YEAR. This is FACT and the numbers are public record. People believe he had some kind of magic surplus because that is how the Media spins it every time they talk about Clinton. It's a total lie.

When it is claimed that Clinton paid down the national debt, that is patently false--as can be seen, the national debt went up every single year. What Clinton did do was pay down the public debt--notice that the claimed surplus is relatively close to the decrease in the public debt for those years. But he paid down the public debt by borrowing far more money in the form of intragovernmental holdings (mostly Social Security).

To put it in simpler terms the Government Borrowed money from themselves to pay down the debt. Don't try this at home you have to leave it to the "Experts". Hello Social Security Fund... here is your IOU.

If you really want to see how the Clinton Debt Scam worked you can read more here:

http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16

If you want to see it verified the numbers are here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S.

Is it any wonder the Bankers hate Ron Paul? Because he continues to expose the TRUTH about the Banking Fraud that is Destroying the United States of America.

The Federal Reserve has dumped Trillions of Dollars into the EU... and they do this with complete Autonomy because the Federal Goverment has no oversight. It's a complete scam. Print the money then shuffle it around the world however they see fit then stick the tax payer with the results.

arizonataylor profile image

arizonataylor Level 1 Commenter 6 months ago

Yes, I agree about Bill Clinton's administration. It was an on-paper balanced budget. He was merely another tax-and-spend politician. Sadly, we're worse off today than we were even then. Debt, debt, and more debt. What does President Obama call it? Kicking the can down the road? It's become a lot larger than a can.

Again, good hub. I appreciate your efforts and quick response.

Submit a Comment
You Must Sign In To Comment

To comment on this Hub, you must sign in or sign up and post using a HubPages account.

Please wait working